|
Federal courts FSC
federal court practice has focused on three areas:
- Supporting
local government regulatory schemes against challenges based
on constitutional claims of "takings": FSC helps to support the rationality
of the regulatory framework and to assess the financial impact on the
regulated business. Recent examples include a defense of local mobile
home rent control legislation in California and a defense of a local
tenant relocation assistance program in Seattle.

Calculating damages for plaintiff advocates:
FSC has calculated damages for tenants unlawfully evicted from subsidized
housing in Washington State, for tenants of housing unlawfully allowed
to fall into disrepair in Oregon, and for public housing tenants provided
unreasonably low utility allowances in Miami (Florida).

Assessing the economic rationality of
various public assistance program rules and regulations: Recent examples
include determining the need in the Tennessee Aid to Families with Dependent
Children (AFDC) program, challenging AFDC auto asset limitations in
Iowa and Arizona, and challenging the exclusion of depreciation expenses
from self-employment income for the determination of Food Stamp eligibility
in Maine.
|
 |
| Materials
containing substantive issue analysis can be found on the following
pages :
|
|